Tin Pan Blues |
Friday, August 26, 2011
Peter W. Bardaglio says, in reaction to Cashin's book, cites Carol Gilligan's work on female psychology, and he says
"Cashin's striking illustrations of the breakdown in communication between the sexes regarding the westward move raises serious doubts about the extent to which the companionate ideal of marriage penetrated the antebellum planter class. Indeed, Cashin maintains that migration to the Old Southwest intensified the patriarchal character of family life and compelled women to be even more dependent on men." http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.furman.edu/stable/2209810 Meanwhile, Andrew Cayton rips Cashin a new one in his review: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3788416, as not really a study of frontier life, "exaggerating the cohesiveness of seaboard families" "as well as the isolation of frontier life," her lack of attention to non-planter migrants, her "rigid dichotomy" when describing male versus female behavior, her lack of attention to religion (especially men's role) and her failure to see that disintegrating relationships might have been the cause rather than the result of the migration decision.
Short, Friday afternoon brain addled summary:
Cashin argues for socially disorganized migration driven by desire of independent males to escape the dominance of fathers and to achieve acquisitive capitalist success, carrying with it a disruption of female extended family ties. Censor argues (mostly in light of Oakes) for a mixed experience of success and failure among migrants, with implications for family linkage Billingsly argues for centrality of kinship preservation strategies Sonya Solomon argues for divergence of kinship-preserving versus capital enhancement farm households in modern midwest Baptist argues for migration as male empire-building and kinship network expansion Tuesday, August 23, 2011
Monday, August 22, 2011
A north-side view of slavery: The refugee: or, The narratives of fugitive (Google Books) Contains multiple references to Indiana, Natchez, and other imbook relevant things. The narratives are ambivalent about Indiana, mentioning rights lost and restricted, the Fugitive slave law, but also some prosperity. The Natchez accounts are gut-wrenching. |